Forming our Perspective

Published by Published on
"Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not rely on your own insight. In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths." Proverbs 3:5-6

How is your vision? What characterizes good vision over bad? I think we would all answer that question something like: good vision allows one to see many things both at substantial distance and up close and bad vision cases to inability in seeing either at distance or close by, and may affect what one sees even if clear perhaps there are calcium deposits or clouding in our eye. If we have bad vision we no longer see the world as we ought to. The same can be said about our perspective. Our perspective is the eye through which we see the world. We know that sin darkens our eyes, and we can begin to see light as something foreign, things interrupt how we see God, our neighbors, and even creation. All the same, we still have agency about which fundamental premises we consider true and why. Do we actually seek out the surest truths, that are universally applicable or do even believe such a thing exists? The media we consume is tragically a primary formator of our perspective. 

In the interest of improving ratings, media companies tend to produce both (over)simplified and often negative content. Social media networks use algorithms to change what populates our feeds, based on what we tend to view. The effect of this is what our textbook refers to as social amplifying since instead of encountering opinions contrary to ours, these algorithms associate us only with what we agree with.  This reinforces what we think is true regardless of its implications and associates us with those who believe similar things as us. This effect is called tribalism/“ingroup/outgroup phenomenon” encouraging us to join together thinking we are more infallible than we actually are and thus objectively superior to those that disagree. This is an example of informational social influence.
An example of attribution being affected by normative social influence is that various crime shows depict erratic/violent mental illness victims in an exaggerated manner. Since every person believes themselves to be normal, we tend to think we are impervious to mental illness, unless we admit that we have one. When such people view these shows a stigma against those that have any sort of mental illness/inability is formed. Being labeled as one who has a mental illness or being afraid of being labeled as such tends to decrease the rates of those that seek help and may even decrease emotional wellness (and thus in certain situations contributes negatively to the severity of the mental illness). 

In conclusion, our false self-superiority bias inhibits our empathetic interpersonal mode. Misattribution of the behavior of others, i.e. the attributing of another’s action to either an imagined event or one/some that are not correct, blinds us to who we are actually encountering. False narratives plague society and the true narrative becomes hostile to social flourishing. When it comes to interpersonal conflict, we tend to imagine ourselves as the protagonist, resulting from the ingroup bias. This effect is incumbent upon our nature but is also enhanced by polarizing media such as caricatures, news, and social media algorithms. The social atmosphere(s) we put ourselves in and those we happen to be in can influence our motives and the means we employ in their response. These perspectives can be very unhelpful to actually forming a universal perspective. Furthermore, what is the above missing? Charity, without this there will be no perspective which brings harmony only greater conflict, whereas we used to seek the collective good collectively, we now seek the individual good individually. This lack of love we find in our media continues to darken our vision and moves us away actual goodness, true, and beautiful toward what our disabled vision considers “highest” and “best”. In our myopia, we have lost sight of the good that lies beyond ourselves.

Written by Carter Carruthers
The struggle of the Christian
laden with hard choices.
Seeking great virtue,
we ignore bad voices.

The pull of each nature,
the good and the corrupt.
Which will we follow?
and which to interrupt?

Two paths,
one of light and one of dark.
Which would we choose,
until the moment, with on we continue absolute, 
and from the other must part?
I am a created entity, not a person.

Most Viewed Posts

Justice Finds All

Published by Published on
Image
If you have ever been wronged by someone, you know two things: 1) it seems like they get away with it if we forgive, and 2) if we don’t forgive, we are the ones who suffer. However, sin, spiritual suicide, is its own punishment. Justice is found in the natural progression of events. This is not karma, but the nature of a world made good. When one sins, they violate the goodness they were created in and trade it for a much sadder world. The more we follow a path the harder it will be to escape it. Although nothing is impossible this must not be underestimated. God built justice into reality, when we go against what we were made for we find trouble. The more we go against our nature the more ends we naturally are made for will be lost. When we talk of the problem of evil and we say God permits evil to bring about a greater good, we need to also remember that to go against the way we were made is like throwing rocks in a clock tower. Eventually, events will progress to a point something h
Click Here to Continue Reading This Post

The New Evangelization

Published by Published on
Image
Commissioned to Paint "POPE JOHN PAUL II" by Vatican representatives August 2003 American Master "RUTH MAYER" unveils the painting for His Holiness, Rome Italy Nov 2004 So what makes it new? Haven't we always done evangelization? The answer is the same for the New Atheism, it’s just adapted to the new information, technology, and thus current in its expression and approach. In the coming weeks, we will look at Why someone would evangelize, ways of doing that, and things that stand in its way. For now, though let’s just focus on the distinctions from the old to new and what concerns evangelization. The New Evangelization makes explicit demands of every Christian, it concerns every aspect of our life, and has new demands. First, in distinguishing between the “old” and “new” is really more like a part of the whole system and an emphasized, active, and closer to the whole of the system. To give some background, it is the very same as the Second Vatican Council. It i
Click Here to Continue Reading This Post

Ecce Homo!

Published by Published on
Image
ECCE HOMO! Pilate exclaimed to the crowd I.e. “BEHOLD THE MAN!”  You ever see a picture of gruesome injury and wince, or better, an injury that someone willfully inflicted on another person? The reaction you have is our biological empathy, our mirror neurons at work. As Christians, we have seen the same man under the worst of tortures and forget just how appalling it is. "See, my servant shall prosper; he shall be exalted and lifted up and shall be very high. Just as many were astonished at him so marred was his appearance, beyond human semblance, and his form beyond that of mortals- so he shall startle many nations; kings shall shut their mouths because of him; for that which had not been told them they shall see, and that which they had not heard they shall contemplate." (Isaiah 52:13-15, Isaiah 53 continues with this image and for the sake of space please look up and read it as desired.) This is what love in dialogue with our corruption looks like. Christ had come to save
Click Here to Continue Reading This Post